Introduction

Physical and chemical characteristics of feed coal and its by-products from a Brazilian thermoelectric power plant

Introduction

Electric energy production in sufficient quantity to supply for the Brazilian demand is great prominence in Brazil. The water shortage in Brazil has made the energy supply even more important. According to BP Statistical Review of World Energy [1], the drought in some regions of Brazil since 2013 has resulted in changes in the country's energy levels. Hydroelectric production has significantly fallen from 81% to 69% in 2013.

Coal is the most widely used source for electric power generation. In Brazil, coal is responsible for only 2.5% of energy production [2], but this percentage tends to increase due to the operation of new power plants for supplying the growing energy demand. Brazilian coal-fired power plants have no reached a reasonable level of sustainability yet, due to the various environmental problems related to production process, emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) and disposal of solid waste, coal combustion by-products - CCBs.

According to UFRGS [3], the CCBs generated in Brazilian thermal power plants are discarded in sites for low-costdisposal. The most common alternatives include open and closed landfills, abandoned mines, sedimentation ponds, sedimentation basins, etc [4]. Such practices usually entail in a number of environmental problems, such as contamination of vegetation and rivers around the plants, unproductive use of land in addition to high maintenance costs [5,6]. CCBs generated after coal combustion include fly ash, bottom ash and furnace slag. Among these, fly ash has a wide application due to its pozzolanic properties for concrete and Portland cement production [5]. However, the production rate of CCBs is much high, causing most of this waste to be disposed in inappropriate places and various environmental and economic problems. Thus, the properties of feed mineral coal in thermal power plants and its by-products are important to understand the relationship between these materials and to minimize the environmental impacts caused by coal-fired power plants.

Feed coal and CCBs samples from Figueira Thermal Power Plant (FTPP), located in southern Brazil, were chosen for this study because they are the combustion residues generated in Brazilian coal-fired power plants that present the major environmental problems related to their chemical composition according to previous studies [7,8]. Although the FTPP coal and some of its combustion products have been studied in some works [10-17,6-9], no a systematic characterization, has been done.

The present work is to characterize, to evaluate and to correlate the physical and chemical characteristics of feed coal and combustion by-products from FTPP using several analytical techniques in order to compare these results with the samples from the same power plant after its modernization as well as to propose environmental solutions to minimize the environmental impacts caused by the CCBs disposal.

Materials and Methods Area of Study

Figueira Thermal Power Plant (FTPP) is located at the municipality of Figueira, Paraná State, Brazil and belongs to the state energy company, Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL). This company is currently operated by Companhia Carbonífera do Cambuí, which is also responsible for mining activities [18]. FTPP has been operated since 1963 and has 20MW of energy generation capacity, however, it has been generated only 10.3 MW of energy on average [19].

This power plant will be expanded to increase the average electric energy to around 17.4 MW. The coal consumption will be the same asd today (6500 t/month), but with a new technology [19].

Coal and Ash Samples

The mineral coal used in FTPP is bituminous [6]. After mining from the underground located near the power plant, the coal is processed to reduce the contents of pyrite and other inorganic compounds milled and placed into the furnace, where it will be burned with atmospheric air.

The last stage of coal grinding occurs in the pulverizer and the collected sample from the pulverizer was used as feed coal and labelled as FC.

After the coal burning, three different types of coal combustion products (CCBs), bottom ash (BA), fly ash from cyclone filter (CA) and fly ash from bag filter (FA) were collected.

The bottom ash, in the largest particle size, falls down in a container of water on the bottom of the furnace and is withdrawn from the system. Cyclone filter fly ash at intermediate particle size is collected by a cyclone filter. The smallest particle size ashes (fly ashes) are retained by a bag filter after the cyclone filter. Figure 1 summarizes the coal ash retention systems used in FTPP.

fig-d915df82a1b8ded51c5ca2059a7e45d5

Figure 1 FTPP coal ash retention systems scheme

Characterization Chemical composition

The chemical composition of feed coal and CCBs were determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) in a Bruker S8 Tiger equipment.

Total carbon content

Total carbon content was determined by a LECO analyzer (model CS-400) with a radio frequency furnace (model HF-400A). Firstly, a sample was placed in an alumina crucible and burnt under oxygen atmosphere (99.9% of purity) in a radio frequency furnace, generating CO and CO₂ gases. Subsequently, all CO was converted into CO₂ by a catalyst, and the total quantity of CO₂ was determined by an infrared detector [20].

pH and conductivity

The pH and the conductivity were measured as follows: samples (0.25 g) were placed in 25 mL of deionized water and the mixture was stirred for 24 h in a shaker at 120 rpm (Ética — Mod 430). After ﬁltration, the pH of the solutions was measured with a pH meter (MSTecnopon — Mod MPA 210) and the conductivity was measured with a conductivimeter (BEL Engineering - Mod W12D) [21,22].

Loss on Ignition

The content of loss on ignition (LOI) of feed coal and CCBs were calculated according to the weight loss on the samples subjected to heating at 1020°C for 2 h in a muffle furnace and expressed in percentages.

Bulk Density

The bulk density of zeolitic materials was calculated from the weight of each sample divided by the volume of 35 mL of the sample in a beaker.

Determination of the Specific Surface Area by Gas Adsorption

The N₂ adsorption measurements of the samples were carried out using a Micromeritics Adsorption Analyzer, model ASAP 2010. Prior to measurements, samples were heated at 120 °C for 8 h under vacuum conditions to remove volatiles and moisture. The BET surface areas were obtained by applying the BET equation to the nitrogen adsorption data.

Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC)

In Cation Exchange Capacity measurements (CEC), the samples were saturated with sodium acetate solution (1 mol L^-1), washed with distilled water (1 L) and then mixed with ammonium acetate solution (1 mol L^-1). The sodium ion concentration of the resulting solution was determined by optical emission spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma – ICP-OES (Spectro – Arcos).

Morphlogy

The morphology of feed coal and CCBs was verified by a scanning electron microscope (Philips - XL30). Samples were covered with a thin layer of gold to make them conductive prior to observations in the microscope.

Mineralogical Composition

The mineralogical compositions of samples were determined by X-ray diffraction (Rigaku - Multiflex II X-ray Diffractometer) using Cu Kα radiation at 40 kV and 20 mA. The scan rate was 0.02 °/s and ranged between 5 - 90 º (2θ). Crystalline phase identification was made by using the Search-Match computer program and by searching the ICDD powder diffraction file database, with the help of JCPDS (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards) files for inorganic compounds. Rietveld refinement method was used to quantify the mass percentage of each crystalline phase for each sample. The crystallographic data were analyzed by using the Find It program. The General Structure Analysis System program (GSAS) was used to refine the phases.

Functional Groups Identification

The functional groups present in the coal and in the ash samples were determined by the Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) absorption spectroscopy technique using Thermo-Nicolet equipment, model Nexus 670, with a range of 4000 cm^-1 at 400 cm^-1. Samples were prepared by dissolving the sample itself with KBr (previously oven dried and used as diluent) until a homogeneous mixture was obtained. The solid mixture was pressed to form a pellet and submitted to the equipment.

Thermal Analysis

Sample mass variation as a function of temperature was evaluated by Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) using the TGA thermogravimetric analyzer SDTA 851 - Mettler Toledo. For the feed coal, a mass of 9.3 mg of the previously dried sample was heated using a rate of 10 ° C min^-1 in an inert nitrogen atmosphere with a flow of 50 mL min ^-1, and followed by an isotherm at 1200 ° C in an oxygen atmosphere during 15 min (Fallavena et al., 2013). For the ashes, 7 mg of each sample was previously dried and analyzed under a dynamic nitrogen atmosphere with a flow of 50 mL min^-1 and heated until reach 1200 ° C using a rate of 10 ° C min^-1.

Particle Size Analysis

The particle size distribution for the samples was determined using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments - Version 5.54). Isopropyl alcohol was used as a dispersing medium. The working range of particle size was 0.1 to 1000μm.

Leaching and Solubilization Tests

The ashes environmental classification was carried out by leaching and solubilization tests according to the Brazilian regulations NBR 10005: 2004 and NBR 10006: 2004, respectively. For the leaching tests, 10 g of coal ash sample was stirred with an acetic acid solution (pH 4.93 ± 0.05) for 18 h at 30 rpm (Ética – Mod. 430 Agitator). After filtration, the leachable compounds were extracted, and the elements of interest were analyzed (ABNT, 2004). For the solubilization tests, 25 g of coal ash sample was placed in contact with 100 mL of ultrapure water. The suspension was stirred for 5 min and after it was allowed to stand for seven days at room temperature. After filtration, the solubilized extracts were analyzed (ABNT, 2004). For both the leaching and solubilization tests, the concentration of Hg was determined by graphite furnace atomic absorption cold vapor spectrometry (CV-AAS – PerkinElmer – A Analyst – 800) while the concentrations of all others elements were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES – Spetro – Arcos). The pH and the conductivity in all extracts were also determined.

Results and Discussion Feed coal characterization

The physical and chemical characteristics of the feed coal used for electric energy generation in Figueira Thermal Power Plant (FTPP) are shown in Table 1.

table-wrap-a0faa14cb18ffbc480fe98f1c995daeb

Table 1 Tabel 1. Characteristics of feed mineral coal used for electric power generation at the Figueira Thermoelectric Power Plant – FTPP

Characteristics (FC) Obtained Values Reference

Loss on ignition 72.2 % Present work

Total carbon 55.32 % Present work

pH 6.71 Present work

Conductivity 77 µS Present work

Fixed carbon 43 % UTFG Collection

Calorific value 4.780 kCal/kg UTFG Collection

Ash content 26 % UTFG Collection

Humidity content 10 % UTFG Collection

According to Table 1, feed coal presented loss on ignition of 72.2%, related to the volatile matter which contains hydrocarbons and other light chemical elements in its composition, such as nitrogen, sulfur, and oxygen. These components are converted in combustion gases when mineral coal is burnt. Total carbon content was 55.32%. This amount represents all carbon in the sample which can be converted to CO₂, including organic carbon. According to Unicamp [23], Brazilian coal samples from Butiá, Jacuí, Tubarão and Criciúma mines presented total carbon content of 42.88%, 49.82%, 40.79% e 46.90%, respectively. Thus, feed coal from FTPP presented higher total carbon content when compared to the coal from mines from other parts of Brazil. This factor can contribute to the generation of a greater quantity of electricity, making the thermal plant more efficient. Fixed carbon which is the remaining residue after combustion of coal without the volatile compounds was 43% for FC sample.

The calorific value of FC was 4.780 kCal/kg. According to Unicamp [23], C and H are the main elements that contribute to that parameter, whereas the presence of oxygen decreases the calorific value as well as the necessity of combustion air. Thus, the content of carbon in the coal is directly related to the calorific value, accordingly, coal with a high content of carbon can also present a high calorific value. On the other hand, coal with a high content of humidity and ash is considered as lower quality.

According to Table 1, the pH of FC was 6.71. This pH is related to the soil acidity from Figueira region, from where the coal is extracted [24]. The conductivity value was 77 µS. This parameter is related to the elements which can be dissolved, as metals and other inorganic compounds, which are shown later in chemical and mineralogical composition of coal (Table 2 and Figure 2, respectively). The higher the organic matter content in coal, the higher its calorific value, and therefore the lower its conductivity. The ash content from feed coal was 26%, which is considered high when compared to the ash content from other Brazilian coal samples [25,26]. The humidity content was 10%. According to Unicamp [23], water is usually found in all fuels, particularly in solid fuels, in the form of humidity, and results in a decrease in calorific power besides corrosion-related problems.

The chemical composition of feed coal (FC) from FTPP obtained by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) is given in Table 2.

table-wrap-66b75b378792bac9dfbea096016509c4

Table 2 Tabel 2. Chemical composition (wt%) of feed coal sample from FTPP

Components FC

SiO2 13.0

Al2O3 5.59

SO3 4.94

Fe2O3 2.05

K2O 0.69

CaO 0.581

MgO 0.317

TiO2 0.259

Na2O 0.233

ZnO 0.062

P2O5 0.019

MnO 0.016

PbO 0.005

SrO 0.004

CuO 0.004

As2O3 0.011

ZrO2 0.011

Cr2O3 0.01

Y2O3 <0.001

NiO <0.001

Rb2O <0.001

V2O5 <0.001

MoO3 <0.001

BaO <0.001

fig-e2d2e3e7027416777a8018829a080cd7

Figure 2 XRD Patterns of feed coal sample (Q = Quartz, P = Pyrite and K = Kaolinite)

According to Table 2, FC is mainly composed by SiO₂, Al₂O₃, SO₃ e Fe₂O₃, with a content of 13.0%, 5.59%, 4.94%, and 2.05%, respectively. Quantities below 1% of K₂O, CaO, MgO, TiO₂, and Na₂O are also observed. Other metallic elements such as zinc, manganese, lead, copper, chromium, zirconium and strontium may also be present in coal. The chemical composition of feed coal from FTPP is in accordance with other research both from Figueira coal samples and from other sources [27,7]. As, Cr, Ni, and Pb are considered toxic, thus, their presence in coal needs to be monitored in order to avoid environmental pollution both in the air, where they can be released together with the combustion gases, and also in the solid wastes, where those elements can concentrate [28]. Elements as Hg and U were not determinate in this study, but they can usually be encountered in feed coal samples from Figueira Power Plant [7,9].

Light elements as H, Li, Be, B, C, N e O were not identified by the X-ray fluorescence equipment used in this study but their presence can be detected by using other characterization techniques such as loss on ignition and total carbon content (Table 1), infrared absorption spectroscopy (Figure 3) and thermal analysis (Figure 4), which will be discussed later.

Silicon, sulfur, iron and aluminum contents are related to mineral phases of quartz, pyrite, and kaolinite present in the sample. These crystalline phases obtained by X-ray diffraction (XRD) can be observed in Figure 2. The XRD Patterns, chemical formulas and mass percentage of the different crystalline phases identified in the feed coal sample are shown in Table 3.

table-wrap-0e427163041c857d1c870d1fc6366e05

Table 3 Tabel 3. XRD Patterns, chemical formulas and mass percentage of the different crystalline phases identified in the feed coal sample (FC)

Crystalline Phases XRD Pattern Chemical formula Percentage

Kaolinite (K) 74-1784 Al₂Si₂O₅(OH)₄ 62.3 %

Quartz (Q) 83-539 SiO₂ 31.5 %

Pyrite (P) 42-1340 FeS₂ 6.2 %

In addition to the three identified crystalline phases, Figure 2 indicates the presence of amorphous content in FC through the elevation of the baseline between angles 5 and 30 ° 2θ. That amorphous phase is related to carbon, organic matter, and other inorganic compounds contents present in the sample.

Table 3 shows that Kaolinite was present in a higher percentage (62.3%), followed by quartz (31.5%) and pyrite (6.2%). Pyrite content is in accordance with Neto [28], which attributes a content for this mineral estimated around 7% for Figueira coal. The crystalline phases identified in FC sample are in accordance with the results presented by Pires and Querol [25] and Fallavena, et al. [29] which have studied Brazilian coal samples.

It is important to highlight that the mass percentages obtained by the Rietveld Method (Table 3) were calculated without the amorphous phase. This analysis was only done for comparison between the samples so that the sum of the percentages of the crystalline phases was 100%.

The morphology of the CA sample verified by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) is shown in Figure 3.

fig-7c14c34cd783a7d5a5b9178e42fcdeb1

Figure 3 Scanning Electron Micrographs (SEM) of feed coal (FC): a) Size: 500 X; b) Size: 4000X

According to Figure 3, FC sample is formed of particles of varying sizes and shapes. This morphology is related to the presence of the different compounds showed in chemical and mineralogical composition analysis.

Figure 4 shows the functional groups present in the feed coal, identified by FTIR absorption spectroscopy technique. The bands at 3619.66 cm^-1 and 3405.60 cm^-1 are attributed to free water and hydration water, respectively. The presence of organic matter is related to bands at 2920.31 cm^-1 and 1384.30 cm^-1, which refer to axial and angular deformations of C-H bonds of aliphatic groups, respectively, as well as the bands at 1598.03 cm^-1 and 912.40 cm^-1, which refer to axial and angular deformations of C=C bonds of alkenes. The bands at 1030.37 cm^-1 and 533.16 cm^-1 could be assigned to characteristic bonds of O-Si-O groups, for axial and angular deformations, respectively. The bands at 777 cm^-1 and 466.64 cm^-1 are attributed to the symmetrical stretching vibration and asymmetrical stretching vibration of the O-T-O groups, respectively, where T represents Si or Al present in the crystalline phases of quartz and kaolinite.

fig-771d363e104c3dd667dc180481646f5f

Figure 4 FTIR spectra of feed coal sample (FC)

The functional groups identified by FTIR corroborate with the results of the chemical and mineralogical analysis (Table 2 and Table 3). The presence of the amorphous phase, for example, discussed at the XRD results was confirmed by the presence of C-H and C=C functional groups identified by FTIR. In addition, the amount of organic matter present in the coal is reflected in the loss on ignition (LOI) results showed in Table 1.

The TGA and DTG diagrams of FC sample obtained by Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) using the TGA thermogravimetric analyzer are shown in Figure 5. According to Figure 5, TGA curve shows a small decrease in weight related to moisture loss (1.0%), followed by a loss of volatile material between 440 and 523 °C (15.93%) and a loss of organic matter between 523 °C and 1199 °C (26.47%). These first weight losses occurred in an inert atmosphere (N₂). When the sample was placed in an oxidizing atmosphere (from 1200 °C), there was a rapid weight loss of 29.8%, related to the combustion of fixed carbon present in feed coal. According to Fallavena, et al. [29], the peak at 440°C in DTG curve can be attributed to the pyrolysis process of the compounds with structures less stable usually present in Brazilian coal samples as well as the thermal decomposition of pyrite (identified by XRD – Figure 2).

fig-d44fe2b653c8ca0625a2c9de7cfcb430

Figure 5 TGA-DTG diagrams of pulverized feed coal (FC)

The weight loss of FC sample caused by the loss of organic matter (26.47%) together with the weight loss related to the content of fixed carbon at 1200 °C (29.8%) corroborates to the content of total carbon determined for this sample (55.32% - Table 1), showing that these two techniques can be complementary in the characterization study of coal. In addition, TGA-DTG analysis also confirms the results of loss on ignition obtained for FC sample (72.2% - Table 1), which is related to the loss of volatile matter, organic matter and fixed carbon, with weight losses of 15.93%, 26.47%, and 29.8%, respectively. The residual mass of the sample (27.78%) refers to the content of the remaining inorganic material or ashes, and it is similar to the result of the ash content of the coal that feeds Figueira Power Plant, showed in Table 1 (26%).

The results of the particle size distribution of the feed coal sample determined by using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer can be observed in both Figure 6 and Table 4.

fig-0c4cb442c8b4f1fa4afc296383f2597f

Figure 6 Particle size distribution of feed coal sample (FC)

table-wrap-4d428ec4e4a38966239c2b16c229f511

Table 4 Tabel 4. Particle size distribution analysis of FC sample

Sauter mean diameter (D_3.2 - μm) 14.888

Mean diameter related to particles volume (D_4.3- μm) 79.308

Diameter below which 50% of the particles are present (D₅₀ - μm) 43.357

Diameter below which 90% of the particles are present (D₉₀ - μm) 203.287

Sauter diameter (D_3.2) is the average diameter calculated by the equipment based on the average surface area of the particles and it is very important for studies of a surface. The D_4.3 diameter is the average diameter based on the average volume of the particles and can be related to the burning efficiency of coal in the thermal plant. According to Table 4, the D_3.2 and D_4.3 values for FC sample were 14.888 μm and 79.308 μm, respectively. The shape of the curve observed in Figure 6 shows that the particle size distribution follows a normal distribution, thus the average particle diameter of FC coal can be considered to be close to the D₅₀, and therefore around 43.357 μm.

Coal Combustion by-Products (CCBs) Characterization Chemical composition

The determination of the chemical composition of the coal combustion residues is very important to study the most convenient and less aggressive disposition method to the environment as well as to study the potential applications of these by-products. The chemical compositions of the CCBs (by % weight) determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) are given in Table 5.

table-wrap-cc5f179b62399c959969c177dec01dca

Table 5 Tabel 5. Chemical composition (wt%) of coal ash samples

Components BA CA FA

SiO₂ 45.4 46.0 49.2

Al₂O₃ 17.0 16.2 21.6

Fe₂O₃ 10.2 13.2 9.86

CaO 2.76 3.57 2.06

K₂O 2.46 2.20 2.74

SO₃ 1.46 1.54 1.65

TiO₂ 0.863 0.86 1.20

MgO 0.936 0.848 1.02

Na₂O 0.942 1.01 1.23

ZnO 0.136 0.022 0.682

MnO 0.084 0.099 0.061

P₂O₅ 0.039 <0.001 0.097

Cr₂O₃ 0.055 0.062 0.048

PbO <0.001 0.02 0.049

As₂O₃ 0.026 0.034 0.16

ZrO₂ 0.063 0.067 0.099

Rb₂O 0.012 0.011 0.014

SrO 0.02 0.022 0.029

NiO <0.001 0.009 0.011

CuO 0.012 0.015 0.022

Y₂O₃ 0.016 <0.001 0.028

V₂O₅ 0.06 0.053 0.082

MoO₃ 0.014 0.016 0.03

BaO 0.038 <0.001 <0.001

SiO₂/Al₂O₃ 2.47 2.57 2.19

There were no significant variations among the contents of the main oxides present in the ashes. The sum of main oxides (SiO₂+ Al₂O₃+ Fe₂O₃) was 72.6, 75.4 and 80.7% for BA, CA and FA, respectively. These ashes were classified as Class F type according to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM C618). The contents of Si and Al were above 60% for all samples indicating that these materials can be used for the synthesis of alternative adsorbent materials [10,30-32,8] . The contents of CaO, K₂O, and SO₃ were between 1.5 and 3.6%. The iron and sulfur compounds (Fe₂O₃ and SO₃) are derived from the pyrite (FeS₂) usually present in the feed coal (determined by XRD – Figure 2). The presence of S in CCBs shows that not all the sulfur present in the pyrite can be converted into SO₂ and SO₃ gases after the coal combustion. Low variations in the amounts of the presented compounds can occur due to the different exposure time of each waste to the heat from the flue gas that comes from the furnace, which allows that some volatile elements to separate from the solid phase and migrate to the gaseous phase. The SiO₂/Al₂O₃ ratios were calculated for coal ashes and the values ranged from 2.19 to 2.57. These values are consistent with other studies [33,4].

In order to understand how the main elements present in the coal behave during the combustion, in which type of waste they are more likely to concentrate and which elements are more or less volatile, the Enrichment Factor (EF) was calculated. Through EF, the concentrations of the different elements can be normalized using as reference a non-volatile element for which their concentration is known in both coal and ash. The use of EF is more convenient than the direct comparison between the concentrations of the elements. The non-volatile elements most used in this calculation are Al, Ce, Fe, Si, and Ti, among others. In the present study, Al was chosen as the non-volatile element [25,26]. The EF was calculated for bottom ash (EF_BA), for the ash from cyclone filter (EF_CA), and for the fly ash from bag filter (EF_FA) by equations (1), (2) and (3), respectively:

\begin{equation} EF_{BA}=\frac{\left [ \frac{C_{oBA}}{CAl_{BA}} \right ]}{\left [ \frac{C_{oCoal}}{CAl_{Coal}} \right ]} \tag{1} \end{equation}

\begin{equation} EF_{CA}=\frac{\left [ \frac{C_{oCA}}{CAl_{CA}} \right ]}{\left [ \frac{C_{oCoal}}{CAl_{Coal}} \right ]} \tag{2} \end{equation}

\begin{equation} EF_{FA}=\frac{\left [ \frac{C_{oFA}}{CAl_{FA}} \right ]}{\left [ \frac{C_{oCoal}}{CAl_{Coal}} \right ]} \tag{3} \end{equation}

Where, C_o is the concentration of a given element and CAl is the concentration of aluminum in the concerned waste (BA, CA or FA) or in the feed coal [25,26,34].

By using this normalization system, the enriched elements in the ashes will reach an EF > 1. On the other hand, the most impoverished elements will have an EF < 1 (Font et al., 2012). A comparison among the EFs determined for each ash can also be made to verify in which waste the concerned element concentrates more and verify its volatilization. Figure 7 shows the EFs calculated for the different chemical elements present in the ashes.

fig-55ccdf765d5ededbe6afb785d83c441f

Figure 7 Enrichment Factor (EF) to the main elements from BA, CA and FA samples

According to Figure 2, the elements enriched in the fly ash from bag filter (which presented EF > 1) in descending order were as follows: As (FE = 3.8), Zn (2.8), Pb (2.5 ), Zr (2,3), Sr (1,9), Cu and Na (1,4), P (1,3), Fe, Ti, and Cr (1,2). The three elements which presented the highest EF in the fly ash (As, Zn and Pb) were impoverished in bottom ash (EF of 0.8, 0.7 and 0 for the elements, respectively), but presented an intermediate value (and higher than 1.0) for the cyclone ash. These results indicate that those elements are still volatile at the cyclone filter temperature and condense inside the bag filter when the temperature decreases, concentrating on the ashes with a smaller particle size (FA). CA sample presented EF > 1 for the following elements: Fe, K, Ca, Ti, Na, Zn, Sr, Mn, Pb, Cu, As, Zr and Cr. Most of these elements are also concentrated in the FA sample and are depleted in the BA sample, with the exception of Ca and Mn, which concentrated more in the CA sample.

The elements that presented the highest enrichment in the bottom ash sample (BA) and, therefore, presented low volatility are K and Mg. Sulfur showed impoverishment for all ash samples, indicating that most part of this element is emitted together with the flue gases. Some variations among the enrichment factors determined for the ashes can be related to the affinity of some elements for the unburnt carbon content of the samples [26].

In order to complement the chemical composition study, the determination of total carbon content (TC) of CCBs was also performed (Table 6). Total carbon content was determined by a LECO analyzer.

table-wrap-8686eb50ff3c5c3011350075948b504a

Table 6 Tabel 6. Total carbon content of coal ash samples (wt%)

Samples C (%)

BA 26.83

CA 15.72

FA 3.05

According to Table 6, the total carbon content of CCBs follows the order: BA > CA > FA. That result was expected because BA sample had a shorter exposure time to the flue gases from the burning of coal when compared to the other samples and consequently has more remaining unburned carbon in it (as shown in Figure 1). On the other hand, particles which had a longer exposure time to the combustion gas presented lower total carbon content (Fly ash sample – FA). Studying total carbon content in this CCBs samples is also important in order to compare these results, which reflect the power plant burning efficiency, with the new samples from the same power plant after its modernization.

Physical and Chemical Characteristics

The pH and conductivity obtained from coal ashes are given in Table 7. The pH values of CCBs suspension were very close and presented alkaline characteristics due to the presence of cations of both alkali and alkaline earth metals (showed previously in Table 5) in the ashes, similar to the results reported by other researchers [35,36,8].

table-wrap-0dcda5f3ea671f507e6c85add3aa63c5

Table 7 Tabel 7. Physicochemical properties of coal ashes generated at FTPP

Sample pH C (µS) Loss on Ignition (%) Bulk Density (g cm^-3) S_BET (m² g^-1) External surface area (m² g^-1) CEC (meq g ^-1)

BA 7.56 121.0 17.4 0.6 13.5 0.118 0.05

CA 7.58 138.0 13.9 0.8 11.5 0.234 0.07

FA 7.56 183.0 8.0 0.8 8.4 1.35 0.16

The conductivity values of fly ashes suspension were 121,0 µS, 138 µS, and 183,0 µS, for BA, CA, and FA, respectively. This crescent order is related to the decreasing order of particle size for the different CCBs (shown posteriorly in the morphology study in Figure 8 and confirmed in the particle size analysis). Because fly ash sample (FA) has the smallest particle size, some compounds present in its chemical composition (showed in Table 5) as As, Ba, Cr, Cu, Mo, and Sr, can undergo dissolution easier than the samples with higher particle sizes, conferring its suspension higher conductivity. These results are in accordance with other studies reported the values of conductivity for different Brazilian fly ashes [7,8].

It should be noted that the ashes with the lowest total carbon contents (FA and CA - Table 6) also presented higher conductivity values. Depoi et. al. [7] explains that as the carbon content gets lower, the level of solubilization of the other elements gets higher, what is in accordance with this study.

As shown in Table 7, the values of loss on ignition for CCBs followed the same decreasing order of TC (BA>CA>FA - Table 6), confirming that the sample with a shorter exposure time to the heat gases from the power plant furnace, the bottom ash sample (BA), was less burnt than the other two samples, and therefore presented higher loss on ignition.

According to Table 7, bulk density was very similar to all samples, but it was slightly lower for BA. Because BA sample presents higher particle size, it occupies a higher volume for the same sample weight, conferring it lower density when compared to the other two samples. In addition, BA also presented higher content of carbon, that besides being a light element, it also confers a greater porosity to the sample, giving it less weight for a given volume.

The specific surface area (S_BET) determined by a Micromeritics Adsorption Analyzer, and the external surface area, obtained by a laser diffraction particle size analyzer were both obtained for CCBs and, are also given in Table 7. The decreasing order of the specific surface area values (BA>CA>FA) suggests that the porosity of materials increases with the content of carbon, resulting in higher internal surface areas and consequently higher total surface areas (BET area). On the other hand, when only the external surface area is considered, its values will vary depending on particles size. Therefore, external surface area increases with the increasing of particle size according to the order: BA (0.188 m² g ^-1) < CA (0.234 m² g ^-1) < FA (1.35 m² g^-1). The cation exchange capacity results (CEC - Table 7) show that the values for the CCBs were 0.05, 0.07 and 0.16 meq g^-1 for the BA, CA and FA samples, respectively. These results suggest that the smaller the particle size for an ash sample and the larger its external surface area (observed for FA sample), the higher the capacity of the material for the cations exchange.

Morphology

The scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of the coal combustion by-products increased by 1000X and determined by a scanning electron microscope are shown in Figure 8. Coal fly ash particles typically had the predominance of spherical shapes at different sizes, which is a result of the burning of the coal in the pulverized form. This morphology is similar to previous observations in other researches [21,36,37,4]. Different physical states of silica are responsible for the particles of irregular size [37]. According to Figure 8, in general, the particles size of the samples followed the decreasing order: BA>CA>FA. As previously mentioned, the size of the particles of each type of ash is related to the specific ash retention system and how long each residue was exposed to the flue gas after the combustion of coal. Thus, all the differences between the CCBs related to the total carbon content, loss on ignition and external surface area can be also explained.

fig-c84550e96f5eae9c1855a465a1628fbd

Figure 8 Scanning Electron Micrographs (SEM) of coal ashes: a) BA; b) CA; c) FA

Mineralogical Composition

Crystalline phases identified for the ash samples and determined by X ray diffraction (XRD) are shown in Figure 9. The three ash samples are composed mainly of quartz, mullite, and magnetite (which are also confirmed from their chemical compositions - Table 5). These crystalline phases are typically encountered in this type of material and were identified in other studies [21,38-42]. The differences between the relative intensities of the XRD patterns may indicate different ratio for the phases as well as may be the result of sample preparation [4]. All diffractograms also presented the amorphous phase, which can be attributed to the amorphous silica content in these materials. Table 8 shows the XRD patterns and the chemical formulas of each crystalline phase identified in the CCBs.

fig-90ca1aabf1c35773d4aa941d52c8bebe

Figure 9 XRD Patterns of coal ash samples (Q = Quartz, M = Mullite and Ma = Magnetite)

According to Figure 2, quartz is also present in the precursor coal and did not change its crystalline form under the power plant burning conditions. On the other hand, mullite and magnetite were formed after some mineralogical modifications of kaolinite and pyrite from the feed coal, respectively (Figure 2), after the combustion process. Table 9 shows the percentages (by % weight) of the different crystalline phases of the CCBs, obtained by the Rietveld Method.

table-wrap-edd49bd0eeff30ded225f22398b22146

Table 8 Tabel 8. XRD Patterns and chemical formulas of the different crystalline phases identified in the coal ash samples

Crystalline Phases XRD Pattern Chemical formula

Quartz (Q) 83-539 SiO₂

Mullite (Mu) 89-2645 Al_4,8Si_1,2O_9,6

Magnetite (Ma) 89-691 Fe₃O₄

table-wrap-f630d66e28624c830f5000f7b9f5ed4c

Table 9 Tabel 9. Percentages by weight from different crystalline phases of CCBs obtained by Rietveld Method

Sample Quartz (%) Mullite (%) Magnetite (%)

BA 47.0 49.0 4.0

CA 57.0 40.3 2.7

FA 47.11 48.7 4.2

As explained before, the mass percentages obtained by the Rietveld Method were calculated without the amorphous phase, only for comparison between the samples. According to Table 9, the mass percentages of the different crystalline phases had small variations among the samples. The highest contents were quartz and mullite for all the ashes. The differences between the phase quantities can be attributed to the different temperatures that the residues were when they were collected from each waste retention system.

Identification of Functional Groups

The functional groups present in the CCBs samples and identified by FTIR absorption spectroscopy technique are shown in Figure 10. The three samples presented very similar infrared spectra, with an intense and wide band close to 3446.07 cm^-1 related to the axial deformations of O-H bonds, which can be attributed to water. Angular stretches and angular deformations in a band at 2925.38 cm^-1 and in a peak at 1384.55 cm^-1, respectively, related to C-H bonds of organic groups were also found. Similarly to the infrared spectra of feed coal (Figure 4), the bands at 1077.14 cm^-1 and 543.81 cm^-1 could be assigned to characteristic bonds of O-Si-O groups, for axial and angular deformations, respectively. The FTIR spectra also showed characteristic frequencies of symmetrical stretching vibrations of O-T-O groups (close to 777.4 cm^-1) and also angular deformation vibrations of the same group at 454.64 cm^-1, where T can represent Si or Al, related to the crystalline phases of quartz and mullite (previously identified by XRD - Figure 9) or may indicate the presence of amorphous aluminosilicates. These results are in accordance to Carvalho [12] and Fungaro et al. [14] who identified the functional groups of Brazilian coal ashes, as well as to Bieniek et al., [43], who identified the functional groups of foreign ashes.

fig-1498bd7e695f4f82bd8802c68935af7a

Figure 10 FTIR spectra of coal ash samples

By comparing the feed coal and the CCBs FTIR spectra (Figure 4 and Figure 10, respectively), it can be noted that the intensities of peaks and bands related to the bonds of carbon compounds were reduced, showing the reduction of organic matter in the ashes after the coal combustion [44]. On the other hand, the band close to 1030 cm^-1 was extended, indicating an increase in the vibrational modes of the O-Si-O bonds, which shows that those elements in the ashes can take other combination when feed coal is burnt (such as mullite formation or the presence of amorphous phase formed after the silicon fusion).

Thermal analysis

The thermal analysis of the CCBs was carried out in order to understand the relationship between the contents of moisture, organic matter, inorganic matter and residual carbon, as well as to verify the stability of the compounds in the ashes. The TGA and DTG diagrams of BA, CA, and FA samples were evaluated by Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) using the TGA thermogravimetric analyzer and, are shown in Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, respectively.

fig-79c66c70a35e8d630ec308eb0e94c1be

Figure 11 TGA-DTG diagrams of bottom ash sample (BA)

fig-d55426750e3fa4996193a76e207c8353

Figure 12 TGA-DTG diagrams of cyclone ash sample (CA)

fig-a518392acc2529b32bb9c2e48840f38b

Figure 13 TGA-DTG diagrams of fly ash sample from bag filter (FA)

BA sample (Figure 11) presented a small loss of weight related to moisture loss (0.51%), followed by a loss of 25.97% related to the organic matter, between 216°C e 813°C. The loss of organic matter is clearly shown in the DTG curve at 527°C, and can be related to the total carbon content showed before for BA sample (26.83% - Table 6). The loss of weight between 813°C e 1297°C (3.16%) can be attributed to the degradation of the organic compounds as well as the pyrolysis of the residual carbon. The residual mass content related to the inorganic compounds was 70.37%.

TGA and DTG curves for CA sample (Figure 12) were very similar to those of BA sample. The decrease in weight related to moisture loss was 0.048%, followed by a loss of 20.62% related to volatile material, between 154°C and 625°C. The losses of weight related to the degradation of the organic compounds as well as that related to the pyrolysis of the residual carbon were 0.92% and 5.36%, respectively (between 625°C e 1297°C). The residual mass of CA sample (73.05%), related to inorganic compounds content, was higher than that presented for BA sample. This result was expected once the cyclone ash sample was exposed a long time to the combustion gases than BA.

FA sample presented a different thermal behavior than the other two ashes. As shown in Figure 13, initially there was a mass increase of 1.25% (up to 180 ° C), probably resulting from the interaction between the nitrogen used in the analysis and the sample through adsorption and absorption phenomena. This interaction between sample and analysis atmosphere is possible since FA sample has very small particles when compared to the other ash samples. The weight loss of 5.64%, related to both organic matter and incorporated nitrogen occurred between 180°C e 685°C. In addition to the loss of weight related to the degradation of the organic compounds and the residual carbon pyrolysis (between 685°C e 1298°C), there was also a change in the sample clearly showed when DTG curve fell at 1082 ° C and 1109 ° C, which can be attributed to a change in the fly ash compounds structure, once the TGA curve had a constant loss of weight. The residual mass of FA was, as expected, higher than the others (92.48%) and it is in accordance with the result of its loss on ignition (8% - Table 7). It is important to note that FA sample melted around 900° C. This could happen because of the interaction and aggregation of small particles of FA, which allow the easier heat propagation when subjected to high temperatures.

Residual masses of feed coal (FC) and BA, CA and FA ash samples (Figure 5, Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13, respectively), shown in thermal analysis study decreased in the following order: FA> CA> BA> FC. These results corroborate to the previous results of loss on ignition (LOI) and total carbon content (TC) because of the different degrees of burn for each sample, as explained before.

Particle Size Analysis

The type and the efficiency of each ash retention system of a thermal coal-fired power plant are very important factors to determine the size of particles of each solid waste, whether bottom, light or fly ashes. The results of the particle size distribution of BA, CA and FA samples determined by a laser diffraction particle size analyzer can be observed in both Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16, respectively and Table 10.

fig-2ca66a2e2396ad968ea650e6797ac86b

Figure 14 Particle size distribution of bottom ash sample (BA)

fig-172b13806c80a0e781e874d630bf854c

Figure 15 Particle size distribution of cyclone ash sample (CA)

fig-2db2f11a94b6898547d3dcd513776a9b

Figure 16 Particle size distribution of fly ash sample from bag filter (FA)

table-wrap-0ce581409affb1d2fd0337c4fd0a75f7

Table 10 Tabel 10. Particle size distribution analysis of coal ash samples

Samples

D3.2 (μm) D4.3 (μm) D10 (μm) D50 (μm) D90 (μm)

BA 31.878 116.629 17.532 84.600 260.323

CA 25.637 67.773 14.127 49.348 147.704

FA 4.443 12.039 2.018 8.167 27.786

The shape of the curves observed in Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16 shows that the particle size distribution follows a normal distribution, thus the average particle diameter of BA, CA and FA samples can be considered to be close to D₅₀, and therefore are around 84.600 μm, 49.348 μm and 8.167 μm, respectively. The D_3.2 and D_4.3 diameter values, calculated by the equipment and based on the average surface area of the particles and on the average volume of the particles (very important to design particles retention equipment), respectively, are shown in Table 10. The size of particles is in accordance with the scanning electron micrographs results (Figure 8) and thus decreased as follows: BA>CA>FA. D₁₀ values confirm that the smallest particles are in FA sample, as before discussed.

The particle size range for BA sample was between 0.9 and 796 μm. For that sample, the largest particle size (796 μm) is the same as the maximum particle size value of feed coal (shown in section Feed Coal Characterization), indicating that feed carbon particles can be directed to the bottom of the boiler furnace without being burnt during the combustion, thus indicating that the FTPP has low burn efficiency. In addition, BA also has the largest specific area (BET) due to its high unburnt carbon content and, consequently, a higher loss on ignition, as shown before. D₉₀ values show that 90% of the particles of BA, CA and FA samples have diameters smaller than 260.323 μm, 147.704 μm, and 27.786 μm, respectively, which also corroborates to the previous results.

Leaching and Solubilization Tests

The concentration of the chemical elements in the ash extracts of the leaching tests (using acetic acid) and solubilization tests (using water) were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), and are shown in Table 11 and Table 12, respectively. The results complement the characterization study of these materials. According to Fungaro et al. [14], the chemical elements chosen for these tests are those that represent the highest risk to fauna and flora and it is also being used to evaluate the environmental behavior of waste materials.

table-wrap-39680df0927717cfffcff325983db9d8

Table 11 Tabel 11. Concentration of elements leachated from fly ashes and the allowed limit values

Elemen Maximum Limits^* (mg L^-1)

BA CA FA

Ag <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 5.0

As 0.086 ± 0.001 0.111 ± 0.002 1.27± 0.2 1.0

Ba 0.236 ± 0.001 0.161 ± 0.001 0.0269± 0.0002 70

Cd 0.0266± 0.0002 0.031 ± 0.001 0.2731± 0.0001 0.5

Cr <0.01 0.014± 0.001 0.039 ± 0.0004 5.0

Hg <0.01 <0.001 <0.001 0.1

Pb 0.0527 ± 0.0003 0.0527 ± 0.0003 0.047 ± 0.002 1.0

Se 0.107 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.2 0.138 ± 0.002 1.0

(^*) Established by Norm ABNT NBR 10005 [45]

table-wrap-18f2432e142c13a5c071f265ffc7bdbf

Table 12 Tabel 12. Concentration of elements solubilized from fly ashes and the allowed limit values

Table caption

Elements				Maximum Limits^*(mg L^-1)
	BA	CA	FA
Ag	<0.010	<0.010	<0.010	0.05
Al	3.4± 0.04	0.79± 0.05	0.27± 0.01	0.2
As	9.95± 0.2	0.17± 0.01	0.7± 0.03	0.01
Ba	0.038± 0.001	0.15± 0.01	0.022± 0.001	0.7
Cd	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	0.005
Cr	0.36± 0.01	<0.01	0.042± 0.003	0.05
Cu	<0.05	0.074± 0.005	<0.05	2
Fe	0.376± 0.005	0.31± 0.06	<0.1	0.3
Hg	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	0.001
Mn	0.013± 0.001	0.027± 0.008	<0.01	0.1
Na	190.5± 0.2	92± 2	77± 3	200
Pb	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	0.01
Se	0.43± 0.03	0.045± 0.001	0.039± 0.001	0.01
Zn	0.093± 0.003	0.21± 0.001	<0.1	5

(^*) Established by Norm ABNT NBR 10005 [45]

According to Table 11, FA sample was the only one that presented in the leachate solution a concentration (for As) above the allowed limit by Brazilian regulation (1.27 mg L^-1, while the limit is 1.0 mg L^-1). Thus, the FA sample is considered hazardous and can be classified as Class I, while CA and BA samples can be classified as Class II (non-hazardous waste). Therefore, the disposal of the ash from the bag filter should be carried out after treatment or be carefully disposed of in industrial landfills designed to handle hazardous waste in order to avoid contamination on site.

The solubilization test complements the leaching study and classifies non-hazardous waste as inert or non-inert by NBR 10006 [46]. This study was performed for all samples (including FA) for comparison. According to the results showed in Table 12, all samples presented concentration values for Al and As above the allowed limit, whereas only for BA sample the extracted solution also presented high concentrations of Cr and Fe. It is noteworthy that, when the lead concentration was considered, it was not possible to classify the wastes in the solubilized extract (Table 12), since the equipment detection limit is above the limit of the Brazilian regulation.

Hg determination was below the equipment detection limit (Table 11 and Table 12). According to Depoi et al. [7], the determination of mercury can be impaired due to the absence of an oxidizing agent in the solution able to stabilize this element, as well as due to the increase of temperature in the solution caused by the stirring of suspension during the tests. The classification of the tested materials is summarized in Table 13.

table-wrap-f13f6fb63ebba50f98d032bed59b919f

Table 13 Tabel 13. Summary of the classification of wastes from coal combustion according to NBR 10005 and 10006 <xref id="xref-41a6d7cee538b55654f1bc2738203f9d" ref-type="bibr" rid="ref-a6c30c119abc703dcb259d5db4e42bdd ref-5af000a8d57fc51faf8b0c42e0701ce2">[45,46]</xref>

Sample Leaching test Solubilization tests

BA Class II – Non-Hazardous Non-Inert – Class II A

CA Class II – Non-Hazardous Non-Inert – Class II A

FA Class I – Hazardous -

According to Table 13, although BA and CA samples are considered non-hazardous, they are also non-inert, thus they should be disposed of in landfills or co-processed. It is worth mentioning, as explained by Querol et al. [47], that coal ashes are not completely inert and can, over time, mobilize trace elements of their mineral fraction. Therefore, stabilization and immobilization studies of toxic elements present in this type of waste are needed in future research.

Conclusions

Feed coal from Figueira Thermal Power Plant (FTPP) presented 72.2% of volatile matter, of which 55.32% corresponded to the total carbon content. LOI, FTIR, TGA and TC results were correlated and confirmed these results. The main mineral phases found in FC and determined by XRD were quartz, kaolinite, and pyrite. XRF and FTIR techniques were also used to confirm those results. Particle size distribution results, related to the burning efficiency in coal-fired power plants followed a normal distribution, with a D₅₀ of 43.357 μm. Elements as As, Cr, Ni, and Pb were found in FC sample, indicating that the burning of the feed coal should be monitored due to the toxic potential of those elements.

Coal combustion by-products (CCBs) presented similar chemical composition, with a total content of the main oxides (SiO₂, Al₂O₃, and Fe₂O₃) above 72% for the three samples, and were classified as class F according to ASTM. Ashes enrichment factor analysis showed that As, Zn, and Pb concentrate mainly in fly ash from bag filter (FA), whereas the elements that presented higher enrichment in the bottom ash (BA) and therefore present low volatility are K and Mg. All ashes presented quartz, mullite, and magnetite as crystalline phases as well as the same functional groups, which indicated contents of humidity, organic matter and Si and Al compounds. The XRD, XRF, TGA, FTIR LOI, and TC techniques complemented themselves to confirm the results. Total Carbon content (TC) of CCBs samples decreased in the following order: BA (26.83%) > CA (15.72%) > FA (3.05%). These contents were related to the surface area, TGA, LOI, particle size analysis, and SEM results. Also, all CCBs presented similar pH and conductivity values. Those results were related to the chemical composition, Enrichment Factor (EF), particle size analysis, LOI, and external and total surface areas.

Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) results for the ashes followed the increasing order: BA < CA < FA and showed a relationship with both the particle size analysis and the external surface areas. CCBs showed a very similar particle size distribution and, all results were in accordance with external surface area values and morphology. Leaching and solubilization tests of CCBs showed that FA sample was considered hazardous and classified as class I waste, while CA and BA samples were considered non-hazardous and non-inert wastes and classified as class II-A. Therefore, FA disposal should be done after treatment or very strict criteria conditions for its disposal needs to be followed.

Stabilization and immobilization studies of toxic elements present in ashes are needed in future research in order to avoid contamination on waste disposal site. In addition to contributing to the understanding of the relationship between coal and its combustion products, this work can also help to reduce the environmental impacts caused by the CCBs disposal, as well as can also be used to compare the characteristics of CCBs from FTPP with the new wastes that will be generated by the same thermal power plant that will be soon modernized.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) for the financial support in carrying out this research. We also acknowledge Figueira Thermal Power Plant, located in southern Brazil, for the assistance in collecting coal and ash samples, besides technical visits. We acknowledge Professor Nelson Batista de Lima and Renê Ramos de Oliveira for the assistance in the X-ray diffraction analysis as well as Sergio Carvalho Moura for the assistance with total carbon analysis. Thanks also go to Dr. Ivana Conte Cosentino from Materials Science and Technology Center, Nuclear and Energy Research Institute, for assistance in the operation of BET Surface area Analyser equipment and Celso Vieira de Morais for the assistance with SEM data acquisition.

20 05 http://www.bp.com 2015 BP Statistical Review of World Energy BP Statistical Review of World Energy

20 05 http://www.aneel.gov.br 2015 ANEEL - Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica ANEEL - Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica

Porto Alegre

Editora da Universidade/UFRGS

2000

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Centro de Ecologia

Carvão e meio ambiente

São Paulo, Brasil

Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares

2013

10.11606/T.85.2013.tde-03042013-092703

Izidoro

Juliana de Carvalho

Síntese e caracterização de Zeólita pura obtida a partir de cinzas volantes de carvão

Porto Alegre

Cientec

2006

Rohde

G.M

Zwonok

Chies

Da Silva

N.I.W.

Cinzas de carvão fóssil no Brasil. Aspectos técnicos e ambientais

3 06

423-469

32 2014

10.1260/0144-5987.32.3.423

Kalkreuth

Levandowski

Delgado

Scheffer

Maia

S.M.

Peralba

M.C.R.

Barrionuevo

Energy Exploration & Exploitation Evaluation of Environmental Impacts of the Figueira Coal-Fired Power Plant, Paraná, Brazil

3 11

227-236

76 2008

10.1016/j.coal.2008.07.013

Depoi

Fernanda S.

Pozebon

Dirce

Kalkreuth

Wolfgang D.

International Journal of Coal Geology Chemical characterization of feed coals and combustion-by-products from Brazilian power plants

38-44

97 2012

10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.01.009

Izidoro

Juliana de C.

Fungaro

Denise Alves

dos Santos

Fernando S.

Wang

Shaobin

Fuel Processing Technology Characteristics of Brazilian coal fly ashes and their synthesized zeolites

3 12

597-602

270 2006

10.1007/s10967-006-0467-0

Flues

Camargo

I. M. C.

Silva

P. S. C.

Mazzilli

B. P.

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Radioactivity of coal and ashes from Figueira coal power plant in Brazil

45-50

34 2009

10.1590/s0100-46702009000100007

Fungaro

D. A.

Izidoro

J. C.

Bruno

Eclética Química Aplicação de material zeolítico sintetizado de cinzas de carvão como adsorvente de poluentes em água

3-4 01

269-281

77 2009

10.1016/j.coal.2008.05.005

Levandowski

Janaina

Kalkreuth

Wolfgang

International Journal of Coal Geology Chemical and petrographical characterization of feed coal, fly ash and bottom ash from the Figueira Power Plant, Paraná, Brazil

358-363

33 2010

10.1590/s0100-40422010000200023

Carvalho

Terezinha Elizabeth Mendes de

Fungaro

Denise Alves

Izidoro

Juliana de Carvalho

Química Nova Adsorção do corante reativo laranja 16 de soluções aquosas por zeólita sintética

Zeolites: Synthesis, Chemistry and Applications

Nova Science Publishers, Inc

2012

978-1-61942-861-4

Fungaro

Denise A.

Yamaura

Mitiko

Carvalho

Terezinha E. M.

Graciano

José E. A.

Andreyev

M. K

Zubkov

O. L

Zeolite from fly ash-iron oxide magnetic nanocomposite: Synthesis and application as an adsorbent for removal of contaminants from aqueous solution

USA

Nova Science Publishers, Inc

2013

978-1-62948-044-2

Fungaro

Denise

Izidoro

Juliana

Santos

Wang

Shaobin

Fly Ash: Sources, Applications and Potential Environmental Impacts Coal Fly Ash from Brazilian Power Plants: Chemical and Physical Properties and Leaching Characteristics

02 14 04

5093-5101

48 2013

10.1007/s10853-013-7297-6

Yamaura

Mitiko

Fungaro

Denise Alves

Journal of Materials Science Synthesis and characterization of magnetic adsorbent prepared by magnetite nanoparticles and zeolite from coal fly ash

97 2 106 2 2014

Fungaro

Denise A.

Magdalena

Carina P.

Environment and Ecology Research Counterion Effects on the Adsorption of Acid Orange 8 from Aqueous Solution onto HDTMA-Modiﬁed Nanozeolite from Fly Ash

148 3 161 1 2015

Cunico

Patricia

Kumar

Anu

Fungaro

Denise A.

Journal of Nanoscience and Nanoengineering Adsorption of Dyes from Simulated Textile Wastewater onto Modified Nanozeolite from Coal Fly Ash

29 07 http://www.copel.com 2016

COPEL - Companhia Paraense de Energia

28 07 http://www.aen.pr.gov.br 2016

Agência de Notícias do Paraná

2005 International Nuclear Atlantic Conference - INAC 2005

Santos, SP, Brazil

2005

Sassine

André

Moura

Sergio C.

Almeida

Luciano P. S.

Domingos

Morise L. S.

Martins Jr.

Hélio A.

da Silva

Camila

Bustillos

José O. V.

Determinação De Carbono Em Amostras De Siliceto De Urânio Para Reatores Nucleares

Barcelona, Espanha

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

2002

Umaña Peña

Juan Carlos

Síntesis de zeolitas a partir de cenizas volantes de centrales termoeléctricas de carbón

25 3 08

946-952

136 2006

10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.038

Wang

Zhu

Journal of Hazardous Materials Characterisation and environmental application of an Australian natural zeolite for basic dye removal from aqueous solution

28 09 http://www.fem.unicamp.br/~em672/GERVAP2.pdf 2016

Universidade de Campinas – UNICAMP – Faculdade de Engenharia Mecânica - Prof Waldir A. Bizzo

4 08

479-483

26 2003

10.1590/s0100-40422003000400006

Flues

Marlene

Hama

Patrícia

Fornaro

Adalgiza

Química Nova Avaliação do nível da vulnerabilidade do solo devido à presença de termelétrica a carvão (Figueira, PR- Brasil)

1 10

57-72

60 2004

10.1016/j.coal.2004.04.003

Pires

Marçal

Querol

Xavier

International Journal of Coal Geology Characterization of Candiota (South Brazil) coal and combustion by-product

272-281

95 2012

10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.017

Font

Córdoba

Leiva

Romeo

L.M.

Bolea

Guedea

Moreno

Querol

Fernandez

Díez

L.I.

Fuel Fate and abatement of mercury and other trace elements in a coal fluidised bed oxy combustion pilot plant

10-11 08

2211-2222

87 2008

10.1016/j.fuel.2007.10.012

Wang

Jie

Yamada

Osamu

Nakazato

Tetsuya

Zhang

Zhan-Guo

Suzuki

Yoshizo

Sakanishi

Kinya

Fuel Statistical analysis of the concentrations of trace elements in a wide diversity of coals and its implications for understanding elemental modes of occurrence

Porto Alegre

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

2010

Neto

José Madrid

Avaliação do impacto ambiental no solo dos terrenos adjacentes à usina termelétrica de Figueira/PR, devido à queima do carvão

859-864

36 2013

10.1590/s0100-40422013000600020

Fallavena

Vera L. V.

Abreu

Cristiane S. de

Inácio

Taísi D.

Pires

Marçal

Azevedo

Carla M. N.

Fernandes

Iolanda D.

Ferret

Lizete S.

Martinez Tarazona

M. Rosa

Química Nova Caracterização detalhada de material de referência certificado de carvão brasileiro

1-4 05

413-423

50 2002

10.1016/s0166-5162(02)00124-6

Querol

Moreno

Umaña

J.C

Alastuey

Hernández

López-Soler

Plana

International Journal of Coal Geology Synthesis of zeolites from coal fly ash: an overview

3 06

327-363

36 2010

10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.003

Ahmaruzzaman

Progress in Energy and Combustion Science A review on the utilization of fly ash

1108 1 1112 11 2013

Ciocinta

Ramona Carla

Harja

Maria

Bucur

Daniel

Buema

Gabriela

Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment Optimization of the conditions for conversion of coal ash into zeolite material

25 17 02

4781-4786

28 1993

10.1007/bf00414272

Shigemoto

Hayashi

Miyaura

Journal of Materials Science Selective formation of Na-X zeolite from coal fly ash by fusion with sodium hydroxide prior to hydrothermal reaction

First Annual NSF Trace Contaminants Conference

Oak Ridge, Tennessee

73 74 August 1973

Gordon

G. E.

Zoller

W. H.

Normalization and Interpretation of Atmospheric Trace-Element Concentration Patterns

Porto Alegre

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

2004

Ferret

Lizete Senandes

Zeólitas de cinzas de carvão : síntese e uso

Porto Alegre

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul

2009

Paprocki

Alexandre

Síntese de zeólitas a partir de cinzas de carvão visando sua utilização na descontaminação de drenagem ácida de mina

2 07

82-87

145 2004

10.1016/j.powtec.2004.04.041

Sarbak

Stańczyk

Kramer-Wachowiak

Powder Technology Characterisation of surface properties of various fly ashes

1350

167-175

116 2008

10.2109/jcersj2.116.167

Jha

Vinay Kumar

Matsuda

Motohide

Miyake

Michihiro

Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan Resource recovery from coal fly ash waste: an overview study

3 09

212-219

12 2010

10.1007/s10163-010-0290-0

Lee

Kyung-Mi

Young-Min

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Synthesis of zeolite from waste fly ash for adsorption of CO2

314-317

105 2013

10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.090

Ibáñez

Font

Moreno

Elvira

J.J.

Alvarez

Querol

Fuel Quantitative Rietveld analysis of the crystalline and amorphous phases in coal fly ashes

453 8 458 5 2014

Widiastuti

Nurul

Hidayah

Mila Zhely Nurul

Praseytoko

Didik

Fansuri

Hamzah

Advanced Materials Letters Synthesis of zeolite X-carbon from coal bottom ash for hydrogen storage material

2 07

166-171

1 2016

10.1016/j.gee.2016.07.002

Jialin

Yang

Chen

Wenting

Dong

Guo

Hua

Kevin

Liu

Hanqiang

Green Energy & Environment The synthesis and application of zeolitic material from fly ash by one-pot method at low temperature

821 826 11 713 2013

Bieniek

Jakub

Ściubidło

Aleksandra

Majchrzak-Kucęba

zabela

Energetyka Properties of fly ash derived from coal combustion in air and in oxygen enriched atmosphere in a pilot plant installation Oxy-Fuel CFB 0.1 MW

5ª Edição

Porto Alegre

Bookman

2002

Skoog

Douglas A.

Holler

F. James

Nieman

Timothy A.

Princípios de análise instrumental

Rio de Janeiro

Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas

2004

ABNT/CEE Comissão de Estudo Especial

ABNT NBR 10005:2004 Procedimento para obtenção de extrato lixiviado de resíduos sólido

Rio de Janeiro

Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas

ABNT/CEE Comissão de Estudo Especial

ABNT NBR 10006:2004 Procedimento para obtenção de extrato solubilizado de resíduos sólidos

7 05

821-838

75 1996

10.1016/0016-2361(96)00027-0

Querol

Xavier

Juan

Roberto

Lopez-Soler

Angel

Fernandez-Turiel

JoséL.

Ruiz

Carmen R.

Fuel Mobility of trace elements from coal and combustion wastes

Characteristics (FC)	Obtained Values	Reference
Loss on ignition	72.2 %	Present work
Total carbon	55.32 %	Present work
pH	6.71	Present work
Conductivity	77 µS	Present work
Fixed carbon	43 %	UTFG Collection
Calorific value	4.780 kCal/kg	UTFG Collection
Ash content	26 %	UTFG Collection
Humidity content	10 %	UTFG Collection

Components	FC
SiO2	13.0
Al2O3	5.59
SO3	4.94
Fe2O3	2.05
K2O	0.69
CaO	0.581
MgO	0.317
TiO2	0.259
Na2O	0.233
ZnO	0.062
P2O5	0.019
MnO	0.016
PbO	0.005
SrO	0.004
CuO	0.004
As2O3	0.011
ZrO2	0.011
Cr2O3	0.01
Y2O3	<0.001
NiO	<0.001
Rb2O	<0.001
V2O5	<0.001
MoO3	<0.001
BaO	<0.001

Crystalline Phases	XRD Pattern	Chemical formula	Percentage
Kaolinite (K)	74-1784	Al₂Si₂O₅(OH)₄	62.3 %
Quartz (Q)	83-539	SiO₂	31.5 %
Pyrite (P)	42-1340	FeS₂	6.2 %

Sauter mean diameter (D_3.2 - μm)	14.888
Mean diameter related to particles volume (D_4.3- μm)	79.308
Diameter below which 50% of the particles are present (D₅₀ - μm)	43.357
Diameter below which 90% of the particles are present (D₉₀ - μm)	203.287

Components	BA	CA	FA
SiO₂	45.4	46.0	49.2
Al₂O₃	17.0	16.2	21.6
Fe₂O₃	10.2	13.2	9.86
CaO	2.76	3.57	2.06
K₂O	2.46	2.20	2.74
SO₃	1.46	1.54	1.65
TiO₂	0.863	0.86	1.20
MgO	0.936	0.848	1.02
Na₂O	0.942	1.01	1.23
ZnO	0.136	0.022	0.682
MnO	0.084	0.099	0.061
P₂O₅	0.039	<0.001	0.097
Cr₂O₃	0.055	0.062	0.048
PbO	<0.001	0.02	0.049
As₂O₃	0.026	0.034	0.16
ZrO₂	0.063	0.067	0.099
Rb₂O	0.012	0.011	0.014
SrO	0.02	0.022	0.029
NiO	<0.001	0.009	0.011
CuO	0.012	0.015	0.022
Y₂O₃	0.016	<0.001	0.028
V₂O₅	0.06	0.053	0.082
MoO₃	0.014	0.016	0.03
BaO	0.038	<0.001	<0.001
SiO₂/Al₂O₃	2.47	2.57	2.19

Sample	pH	C (µS)	Loss on Ignition (%)	Bulk Density (g cm^-3)	S_BET (m² g^-1)	External surface area (m² g^-1)	CEC (meq g ^-1)
BA	7.56	121.0	17.4	0.6	13.5	0.118	0.05
CA	7.58	138.0	13.9	0.8	11.5	0.234	0.07
FA	7.56	183.0	8.0	0.8	8.4	1.35	0.16

Sample	Quartz (%)	Mullite (%)	Magnetite (%)
BA	47.0	49.0	4.0
CA	57.0	40.3	2.7
FA	47.11	48.7	4.2

Samples
	D3.2 (μm)	D4.3 (μm)	D10 (μm)	D50 (μm)	D90 (μm)
BA	31.878	116.629	17.532	84.600	260.323
CA	25.637	67.773	14.127	49.348	147.704
FA	4.443	12.039	2.018	8.167	27.786

Elemen				Maximum Limits^* (mg L^-1)
	BA	CA	FA
Ag	<0.010	<0.010	<0.010	5.0
As	0.086 ± 0.001	0.111 ± 0.002	1.27± 0.2	1.0
Ba	0.236 ± 0.001	0.161 ± 0.001	0.0269± 0.0002	70
Cd	0.0266± 0.0002	0.031 ± 0.001	0.2731± 0.0001	0.5
Cr	<0.01	0.014± 0.001	0.039 ± 0.0004	5.0
Hg	<0.01	<0.001	<0.001	0.1
Pb	0.0527 ± 0.0003	0.0527 ± 0.0003	0.047 ± 0.002	1.0
Se	0.107 ± 0.01	0.13 ± 0.2	0.138 ± 0.002	1.0

Sample	Leaching test	Solubilization tests
BA	Class II – Non-Hazardous	Non-Inert – Class II A
CA	Class II – Non-Hazardous	Non-Inert – Class II A
FA	Class I – Hazardous	-