Peer Review Process
Reviewers are expected to respond promptly to requests to review and to submit reviews within the time agreed. Reviewers’ comments should be constructive, honest, and polite.
Reviewers should declare their conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from the peer-review process if a conflict exists. Reviewers can either accept, reject or ask for revision.
The Editorial board at JAMT follows a time table which is based on it's current workload and as far as possible tries to adhere to it.
Editorial Review 7 days
Peer review 2-4 weeks
Time for authors to revise and send back the correction 3 weeks
Final Decision 1 week
Proofreading week 1 week
Publication on website (XML and HTML) 1 week
Publication (PDF) 2-4 weeks
Print At the end of the year
The process is shown in the figure below: